©Deirdre Nansen McCloskey | COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL


deirdremccloskey Deirdre Nansen McCloskey
Distinguished Professor of Economics, History, English, and Communication
University of Illinois at Chicago

Professor of Economic History, Gothenburg University, Sweden

Deirdre McCloskey is an economist, historian, and rhetorician who has written sixteen books and around 400 scholarly pieces on topics ranging from technical economics and statistics to transgender advocacy and ethics. She is known as a "conservative" economist, University-of-Chicago style (she taught for 12 years there), but protests that "I'm a literary, quantitative, postmodern, free-market, progressive Episcopalian, Midwestern woman from Boston who was once a man. Not 'conservative'! I'm a Christian libertarian." Her latest book, Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World, argues that an ideological change, rather than saving or exploitation, is what made us rich... more »


"There is the more encouragement to labor perseveringly in the removal of prejudices and the inculcation of just principles, inasmuch as the great majority of those whom you will find assenting to the most absurd arguments, and perfectly unmoved by the strongest, have no such natural incapacity for reasoning as some might thence infer; but possess powers which lie dormant for want of exercise; and these they may be roused to exert, when once they are brought to perceive that they have been accustomed to imagine themselves following a course of reasoning, when in fact they were not."
Richard Whately (1832; Introductory Lectures on Political Economy, 2nd ed., chp. 1, para. 11)

"An Economist's Sermon"

ABC Religion & Ethics, 27 November 2013.

Deirdre McCloskey offers a meditation on work and the moral obligation to self-development.

"To put it economically, God wants us to face scarcity. He wants it not because he is a trickster who is amused by seeing us struggle with disease and the law of gravity in our pain-filled and finite lives. He so loves us that, after Eden, he wants us to have the dignity of choice."


Challenging Statistical Significance

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, October 2013.

Video is now available of the October 28 webinar given by Deirdre McCloskey on statistical significance. ICPSR also has posted a new interview with McCloskey on that "tiny technique" of which too much is made.

"Real scientists make a judgment within the context of the conversation of physics or geology or whatever it is. The same needs to be done—and is done, but secretly, behind the curtain—​in economics and sociology and medicine."


"Transgender in America"

WBUR-FM/National Public Radio, 28 August 2013.

Listen as Deirdre McCloskey, Ryan Sallans, Andrew Solomon, and NPR broadcaster Tom Ashbrook discuss gender identity and take phone calls.

More: McCloskey, in the New Republic: "Give Chelsea Manning a medal and some estrogen."


McCloskey replies to David Friedman and others on Bourgeois Dignity and Thomas Malthus

Ideas (David Friedman's blog), July 2013.

The anarchist-anachronist-economist David Friedman is reading Deirdre McCloskey's 2010 book; he offers some thoughts in a blog post, and McCloskey replies in a comment.


Watch: McCloskey talks capitalism on Dutch TV

NTR HoeZo Internationaal, 7 March 2013.

"We have weaker ties—weaker connections with each other—but we have more of them… We still have community in the modern world."

Also: McCloskey is interviewed, both singly and with Arjo Klamer, by Dutch journalist Frank Mulder.

Even more: McCloskey on optimism, neuroeconomics, and hagelslag.


McCloskey comments on Douglas Allen's Institutional Revolution

Review of Austrian Economics, forthcoming.

"A Neo-Institutionalism of Measurement, Without Measurement: A Comment on Douglas Allen’s The Institutional Revolution" is Deirdre McCloskey's contribution to a symposium that will appear in a future issue of the Review of Austrian Economics.

“Allen does yeoman work in explaining some of the peculiarities of British public administration, such as the reliance on aristocratic honor and on the prize system in naval warfare. But he attributes to public administration an implausible effect on private incomes. The merging of power and plenty is mistaken.”


Why Neo-Institutionalism Can’t Explain the Modern World: A Pamphlet

from Bourgeois Dignity (2010)

A five-chapter excerpt from McCloskey's book Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World that contends particularly with the work of economist Douglass North.



"We Agree That Statistical Significance Proves Essentially Nothing"

Econ Journal Watch 10(1), January 2013.

Stephen Ziliak and Deirdre McCloskey have the last word in an Econ Journal Watch exchange with Thomas Mayer over Ziliak and McCloskey's The Cult of Statistical Significance.



"Cautiously Optimistic: Bourgeois Dignity and Global Prosperity"

Centre for Independent Studies, 27 November 2013.



McCloskey delivered the annual John Bonython Lecture at the Centre for Independent Studies in Sydney.


"What's Still Wrong with Marxism: Some Fragments on a Theme"

from Bourgeois Dignity (2010) and Bourgeois Equality (2015), and from teaching materials

This new seminar paper from Deirdre McCloskey (download, .pdf) includes some material from the next book in her Bourgeois Era series.

"The profit in a business that the left abhors is temporary. The reward to venturing for example on robotization has been eroded time and again among improvers by their competition, leaving as fruits much cheaper cloth and steel and autos. After all, a blast furnace and a spinning jenny, or for that matter an Acheulean hand ax or a chariot wheel, are 'robots,' that is, contrivances that abridge labor. In Afrikaans the word 'robot' means what it means elsewhere, following its coinage in Hungary. But it is also the normal Afrikaans word for 'traffic light.' Precisely: any contrivance substitutes for raw labor, equivalent to a robot…"


A Sweet Talk on Free Speech

Institute for Humane Studies, November 2013.



In this persuasive short video, Deirdre McCloskey argues that, in a free society, it's rhetoric all the way down.


"The Great Enrichment Continues"

Current History, November 2013.

McCloskey has contributed an essay to the November issue of Current History, which is centered on the theme "The Future of Capitalism."

"The spirit is not damaged by trying Monday through Friday to innovate and supply in ways that make other people better off. Thank the Lord for the Bourgeois Deal and the Great Enrichment, and for the breakdown of hierarchy that caused them."


"The word data embodies an attitude to facts fatal to serious science."

Capital Ideas (Booth School of Business), Fall 2013.

Deirdre McCloskey identifies the real economics in Robert Fogel's classic work on railroads and growth.


"How Markets and Innovation Became Ethical and Then Suspect"

Cato Institute, 20 June 2013.

Deirdre McCloskey, Dalibor Rohac, and Don Boudreaux

Deirdre McCloskey was the featured speaker at this Cato Institute forum, which can be viewed online or downloaded as an audio podcast.


"Max U, the Virtues and Imprudent Communitarians"

Foundation for Economic Education, April 2013.

Max Borders of The Freeman speaks with Deirdre McCloskey in a four-part videoconference (1, 2, 3, 4).


Deirdre McCloskey receives Julian L. Simon Memorial Award

Competitive Enterprise Institute, 13 June 2013.

McCloskey was honored on June 20 at the Competitive Enterprise Institute's annual dinner and reception in Washington.

Also: Ryan Young and Fred Smith of CEI discuss McCloskey's work in a new podcast. See, too: Fred Smith on Bourgeois Dignity.



Sandel
"The Moral Limits of Communitarianism: What Michael Sandel Can’t Buy"

Claremont Review of Books XII(4), Fall 2012.

McCloskey's full review of Michael J. Sandel's What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets is here on DeirdreMcCloskey.org; a shorter version appears in the Claremont Review of Books.


Deirdre McCloskey reviews Francesco Boldizzoni's The Poverty of Clio: Resurrecting Economic History

Investigaciones de Historia Económica - Economic History Research 9(1), February 2013.

"Boldizzoni's attack on cliometrics is unpersuasive, in part because he does not grasp economics and its uses, in part because he admires uncritically the German Historical School and their modern descendants, the French Annalistes..."

<< Return to page one

You can get news and updates from Prudentia on Twitter.
Looking for a specific McCloskey article? See something amiss? E-mail Prudentia's editor.